| Gamblers | 6 |
| Brewers | 2 |
| FINAL | |
| Dead River | 1 |
| Tuck | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Whalers | 3 |
| Nordiques | 10 |
| FINAL | |
| Tuck | 11 |
| Whalers | 2 |
| FINAL | |
| Brewers | 3 |
| Dead River | 5 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 3 |
| Gamblers | 4 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 8 |
| Dead River | 7 |
| FINAL S/O | |
| Whalers | 2 |
| Gamblers | 3 |
| FINAL S/O | |
| Tuck | 8 |
| Brewers | 2 |
| FINAL | |
| Brewers | 3 |
| Nordiques | 0 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 4 |
| Tuck | 2 |
| FINAL | |
| Dead River | 2 |
| Whalers | 5 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 8 |
| Dead River | 2 |
| FINAL | |
| Tuck | 2 |
| Nordiques | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Whalers | 2 |
| Brewers | 5 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 3 |
| Whalers | 1 |
| FINAL | |
| Brewers | 5 |
| Gamblers | 7 |
| FINAL | |
| Tuck | 9 |
| Dead River | 0 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 6 |
| Nordiques | 5 |
| FINAL S/O | |
| Whalers | 0 |
| Tuck | 4 |
| FINAL | |
| Dead River | 4 |
| Brewers | 14 |
| FINAL | |
| Brewers | 4 |
| Tuck | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Dead River | 3 |
| Nordiques | 7 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 4 |
| Whalers | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Whalers | 3 |
| Dead River | 4 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 2 |
| Brewers | 5 |
| FINAL | |
| Tuck | 5 |
| Gamblers | 4 |
| FINAL S/O | |
| Brewers | 6 |
| Whalers | 5 |
| FINAL | |
| Dead River | 0 |
| Gamblers | 7 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 2 |
| Tuck | 1 |
| FINAL S/O | |
| Dead River | 1 |
| Tuck | 0 |
| FINAL | |
| Whalers | 3 |
| Nordiques | 5 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 10 |
| Brewers | 4 |
| FINAL | |
| Brewers | 2 |
| Dead River | 5 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 1 |
| Gamblers | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Tuck | 5 |
| Whalers | 4 |
| FINAL S/O | |
| Whalers | 4 |
| Gamblers | 3 |
| FINAL S/O | |
| Tuck | 2 |
| Brewers | 1 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 6 |
| Dead River | 4 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 5 |
| Tuck | 2 |
| FINAL | |
| Dead River | 2 |
| Whalers | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Brewers | 5 |
| Nordiques | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Tuck | 7 |
| Nordiques | 2 |
| FINAL | |
| Whalers | 1 |
| Brewers | 4 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 8 |
| Dead River | 4 |
| FINAL | |
| Brewers | 1 |
| Gamblers | 9 |
| FINAL | |
| Tuck | 6 |
| Dead River | 2 |
| FINAL | |
| Whalers | 4 |
| Nordiques | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Whalers | 4 |
| Tuck | 6 |
| FINAL | |
| Dead River | 2 |
| Brewers | 5 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 3 |
| Nordiques | 2 |
| FINAL S/O | |
| Dead River | 3 |
| Nordiques | 7 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 6 |
| Whalers | 8 |
| FINAL | |
| Brewers | 2 |
| Tuck | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 5 |
| Brewers | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Tuck | 3 |
| Gamblers | 5 |
| FINAL | |
| Whalers | 11 |
| Dead River | 7 |
| FINAL | |
| Dead River | 3 |
| Gamblers | 10 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 6 |
| Tuck | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Brewers | 3 |
| Whalers | 2 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 7 |
| Whalers | 2 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 5 |
| Brewers | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Dead River | 1 |
| Tuck | 0 |
| FINAL | |
| Brewers | 1 |
| Dead River | 0 |
| FINAL | |
| Tuck | 0 |
| Whalers | 1 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 5 |
| Gamblers | 6 |
| FINAL S/O | |
| Tuck | 8 |
| Brewers | 1 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 8 |
| Dead River | 3 |
| FINAL | |
| Whalers | 5 |
| Gamblers | 8 |
| FINAL | |
| Brewers | 5 |
| Whalers | 4 |
| FINAL | |
| Tuck | 4 |
| Dead River | 3 |
| FINAL S/O | |
| Nordiques | 7 |
| Tuck | 5 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 2 |
| Brewers | 7 |
| FINAL | |
| Nordiques | 2 |
| Brewers | 5 |
| FINAL | |
| Gamblers | 4 |
| Tuck | 7 |
| FINAL | |
| UVHL USA | 10 |
| UVHL CAN | 9 |
| FINAL | |
| Author: | Thread: |
|---|---|
| JTStally Hanover, NH Registered: Posts: 76 ![]() | POW Voting Feb 23rd, 2010 01:27 AM 2 Total Responses Parky, most websites only let you vote from the same IP address once. There has to be a way to program that for POW! This week's 103 votes isn't that absurd, but three weeks ago there were 519 votes, two weeks ago it was 315, last week it was down to a "manageable" 185 votes...when you think about it, there's less than 100 players in the league... |
| Responses: | |
| kpark Quechee, VT Registered: Dec 2003 Posts: 544 ![]() | I hear ya Feb 23rd, 2010 08:23 AM Stally, we figured it was better to allow people to vote every hour if they wanted. It's really more for fun & interaction than a SERIOUS vote. It is meant to engage our users & bring them back to the site. We could definitely tighten up the voting if that's what everyone wants. KP |
| JTStally Hanover, NH Registered: Posts: 76 ![]() | "Marketing and Promotion" Feb 23rd, 2010 11:28 AM IN RESPONSE TO: Stally, we figured it was better to allow people to vote every hour if they wanted. It's really more for fun & interaction than a SERIOUS vote. It is meant to engage our users & bring them back to the site.
We could definitely tighten up the voting if that's what everyone wants.
KP I like that line of thought, although perhaps once a day would make a little more sense. I think the only people that check the website every hour are you, me, and McD (and the guy trying to win the POW award), but that's really just cause we have nothing better to do and I don't think WE (the three of us) need a poll to keep checking back. |
| TOP CONTRIBUTORS: | |
| kpark | 544 |
| hkydoc | 358 |
| The Dark Canuck | 270 |
| rgrunds | 228 |
| JTStally | 76 |
| Z-Skate | 60 |
| goaliem31 | 60 |
| vtdownhiller | 57 |
| jt | 39 |
| tgove | 35 |
| ghadley | 33 |
| scasnh | 27 |
| Tao Smith | 25 |
| McG | 24 |
| SK8VT | 20 |